Thursday, March 30, 2006

Empire Remixed Promo

We made some promo bookmarks for our evening with the Bish. Registrations are going really well so far, which is pretty exciting since it's a new thing to engage in this kind of conversation in Toronto.

It would be nice to see some of the indie press on board, engaging in this dialogue between culture and theology. But really, what are the chances they'd get in bed with us religious folk?

Tags: Emerging Church, NT Wright, Toronto

Monday, March 27, 2006

Relaxed

So nice to get away. Nice to be back. Now just a month left of intensive studies and negotiating my survival with the Russian Mafia. No biggie.

Saturday, March 25, 2006

Kingston

Random meetings with long-lost friends. Time in the library, and acting as an extra in a movie shoot. So far, a good day.

Friday, March 24, 2006

I Love Queen's

In Kingston visiting Matt, Andrew and Siebren for the week-end. Of course the first thing I do is go to the grad club. Of course the first thing I do is buy a pint of Big Rock Trad Ale. Of course I walk upstairs, open my computer, and pick up Queen's wireless. Of course, my student ID still works, even though I graduated, what was it, three years ago?

I love this place.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Cross, Double-Cross

a reflection on mark 14.32-52

We read this story in the shadow of three crosses.

There is the story in a nutshell. There are the various ways into the story. There is the story itself. There are the stories themselves. There is the question: Whose story is this?

They’d been waiting. Watching and waiting and endlessly praying. Praying for the one to come. The one who would set them free. Who would break them out of tyranny. Who would overthrow. Who would let them know that they were chosen, saved, and would rise in victory.

They thought, hoped, wanted him to lead them all out of poverty. Misery. Slavery. There he was. There they are. Slaves of empire and slaves of desire. Entangled. Still waiting for the dawn. The dawn of a new age. A new covenant. A new deal.

They wait. And as they wait, they fall sleep.

They failed to see what was right in front of their eyes. Stopping and waiting. Pausing and reflecting on all that had happened – the throngs, the Pharisees, the blind man – in that place he had asked them, “who do they say that I am?”

Prophet, drunkard, patriarch, healer, glutton. They’ve called you all these and more. But who are you really? They watched and waited, scared to speak the word. Messiah? And what if he was? What could that mean? Until that point they’d been unsure. Until then they’d avoided the question. But if it was true. If only it could have been true. They thought they understood. They thought they’d caught on. How had they been caught so unaware?

Unaware. Blind. Asleep. These were not their best moments. These are not our best moments.

No one had spoken of it, of how inevitable his death was. Death was denied the recognition it had placed right in front of everyone’s face, in the middle of everyone’s life, in his very body. A recognition he had gone to such extraordinary lengths to receive. They simply refused to acknowledge its presence or its power. All except one.

And now they lie there waiting for the dawn. The dawn of a new age. A new covenant. A new deal. And in this garden, they’re about to see blood. The cross of Calvary follows soon after the double-cross.



There is the story in a nutshell. There are the various ways into the story. There is the story itself (There are the stories themselves). There is the question: Whose story is this?

It was just like a woman, wasn’t it? Just like a woman to go and do something like that. Inexcusable. Trivial. Waste. They all thought it, I’m sure. But he did something about it. I wonder if that was the moment Judas realised what was really going on. That moment, when Jesus graciously accepted my gift. In that moment, the disciples stood in opposition when we should have all been prostrate at his feet.

An anointing for a burial. That must have thrown them off.

I can see the same seeds in Judas that were in the others. All the watching, the waiting, the endless praying. The crowds gathered. They followed him around, watching and waiting and endlessly praying. Praying that He would be the one. The one who would set them free. Who would break them out of imperial tyranny. Who would overthrow. Let them know that they were chosen, they were saved, and that yes, they would rise in victory.

They had held such expectations. Expectations he never met. Expectations he defied at every turn. Feeding thousands. Healing the sick. Making the lame to walk and the blind to see. Never once does he raise a sword against the empire. He even wakes a dead man, but he cannot wake his closest friends from their slumber. In their slumber, dreams of what the world might be like if this so-called Messiah picked up arms against the oppressor. But this was much different from the reality he was. The reality he is. The reality he is to come.

They were dreamers of dreams. Tellers of tales. They lived surrounded by their stories, and the stories of others, seeing everything that happened through them. They lived their lives accordingly. The only problem was that they wanted Jesus to live his life according to their script.

They were waiting for something and someone to overcome, to outlive, to outlast to outplay the imperial hand, to finally conquer the band of outlaws who kill, curse, and crush at every turn. And they wait and they long. They long for the dawn of a new age, a new page, for Jesus’ fire and rage against the Roman machine swallowing them whole.

And when he didn’t. When Judas finally understands that Jesus would not act according to the script, he has no choice. Jesus’ life, his faithful improvisations, tell a different story than the one they wanted to hear. Jesus refuses to be directed, boxed in, or confined by human expectation. He refuses to be nailed down.

Our story closes with a farewell kiss, the plot laid bare.


We read this story in the shadow of three crosses.
The cross of Calvary follows soon after the double-cross.

One. Two. Three times he finds them asleep.
One. Two. Three times betrayed into the hands of sinners.

And yet.
They thought they could pin him;
Thought they'd nail him down once for all.
We’re trying it again, today, this time with words.

Trying to say exactly what I AM in human terms
What, did we forget the last time;
Did we forget the way it was before?

We’re trying it again, today, this time with words.
Thought we'd nail him down once for all.
We thought we could pin him;
And yet.

One. Two. Three times betrayed into the hands of sinners.
One. Two. Three times he finds us asleep.

The cross of Calvary follows soon after our double cross.
We live this story in the shadow of three crosses.

Lent

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

NT Wright - Remixed

Launched www.empireremixed.com today. Here's what it's all about - we hope you can attend.

WRIGHTREMIXED
TUESDAY MAY 9, 8:30 PM
The Revival - Toronto, Ont. - $10 per person
Revival Bar and Night Club
783 College St. Toronto ON, M6G 1C5
www.revivalbar.com

This is where we find ourselves today – living the story, even here, today, in Toronto. Here, today, in Toronto, we'd like to know: what might our city, what might our culture, what might our nation look like with God's kingdom come?

Bishop Tom Wright is no stranger to this conversation. Read through his books and you'll see that he is deeply and intimately concerned with questions of what faith and theology look like in practice, in the midst of this postmodern culture, even here, today. So this is our starting point. This is our first public conversation, and Tom, our first conversation partner. The questions we're asking are not, we hope, self-seeking. Rather, we aim to ask questions that bear directly on the ways in which theology, and especially our reading of Paul, interact with our lives and our culture in 21st Century Toronto.

Dedicated to exploring these questions in multifarious ways, the evening will feature performances by dj teknostep, hip-hop MC illSeer, as well as local singer-songwriters Julia Churchill and Alison Hari-Singh. And you know what? We've even asked the Bish to pick up his guitar for the occasion!

Sharing a few of his own faithful improvisations, on Tuesday May 9th, Tom Wright will join in our conversation, and we hope that you will too.

Doors open at 8pm, and our conversation will follow. The discussion will be facilitated by Brian Walsh, co-author of Colossians: Remixed and Truth is Stranger Than it Used to Be: Biblical Faith in a Postmodern Age.


Tags: Emerging Church, NT Wright

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Drenched-In-Adequacy

The rain comes, beating down, puddles gathering round in a conspiracy of wetness. A wetness that conspires to soak my shoes, my socks, my sanity. Stone cold buildings, architecture of another era, stand resolutely. They will not be moved. They will not be shaken by this affront. An affront to the cold of winter, the cold from whither we escape.

Lossless purity in this rainsoaked misery of broken hearts and untold dreams. Dreams of a better day, of a better way to learn to say what I'm really thinking.

Drenched.

Drenched-in-adequacy, however hard I try to wipe it away, however much I want it to stay.

And the rain it comes, beating down, puddles gathering round in this conspiracy. And so, as you conspire to soak my shoes, my socks, my sanity, I step outside. I stand resolutely. I will not be moved. I will not be shaken by this affront. You are the cold from whither I've escaped. This is no affront at all.

Monday, March 06, 2006

wrightremixed

Stay tuned for the upcoming announcement of a rather cool, and rather different kind of conversation with Bishop of Durham, NT Wright, right here in Toronto.

, ,

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Body and Blood

Republished from House of ROC

I am sitting here holding the body and blood of Christ in my hands. Words wash over me again: “the blessing of hardship”, “sharing in the suffering of Christ”, “makes us more like Him”. I become distinctly aware of my role in his death.

I usually tend to see myself as a friend, a devoted follower of his, an advocate who would never let this atrocity happen, but the reality is that I am very far from who he was and he was very alone in his death.

My sin put him there
My sin left him

shamed
misunderstood
afraid
completely alone

I think of him in Gethsemane and the panic, the pleading, the desperation for rescue from what he knew he was going to go through.

Pleading against the penalty I had established for him. Longing for another way, any way, to play his role in this love story, but there is no other way. He must walk through the fear and pain. He must trust in the process, trust that the Author of time and existence knows what He is writing.

But as I hold that expression of body and blood, I want out. I don’t want to remember, I don’t want to acknowledge my part in this. I feel his fear, abandonment and heartbreak and know that I have done this to him and I want to deny it, to pretend it was someone else, anyone else, everyone else.

[full text]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Lingering Questions

I've been reading Philemon a lot lately. I know it's a short book, but I've been reading it over and over and over, and thinking a lot about how we read scripture.

I'm developing my thinking, my understanding on how it is we are to read the New Testament - individually and in a community of faith - but still struggling to understand exactly how to do this.

Not that there's necessarily just one way, but I'm sure there are some ways that are better than others...

When the Apostle Paul was writing, he treated each situation as unique and important. His letters do not so much forge religious dogma as convey his understanding of how Christianity (read: the Gospel) might be structured in concrete situations.

While the letters function today in the canon of scripture as the “Word of God,” we must consider what this means. If Paul was knowingly writing different letters with different styles, based on different contexts, might we not also consider the necessity of contextualizing the gospel to our own cultural, social, and economic situation? 

Is it not, then, dangerous to absolutise these scriptural passages and superimpose solutions addressing issues of the first century church upon our own world without contextual nuance?

How then are we to read Paul's letters today?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,