Saturday, April 08, 2006

Exclusion and Embrace

Not at all related to the book (mostly because I haven't read the entire thing yet), but here it is all the same.

A lot of churches out there are doing things didfferently. Their liturgy is different, or their services incorporate different forms of expression (newer forms of music, conversational sermons, question periods, etc.) than what has been traditional to the Modern Church.

I guess my primary question relates to how these churches actually engage with the communities they are in. Some have tight membership structures that require membership in the church prior to participation in small groups. But different scholars and practitioners have noted, and continue to observe that people who come to church out of curiosity do not come in if there are numerous barriers to acceptance. Membership is one of these barriers.

How does a church that stresses membership as a way into community, actually function missionally? Can it?

It seems to me that if the entire structure of the church is inward focused -- focused on drawing people into the community, rather than reaching outwards, there will be larger problems to be accounted for unless there is something radically different about the way in which this exclusive membership operates in the real world.

If the membership is concerned with the surrounding community - if it is engaged in communicating the gospel in word and in action, then perhaps such an exclusive membership structure can work. However, if this second tier is more focused on maintaining exclusivity, without finding some other way of creating social space for "non-members" to explore faith in the context of community, it seems that the community has failed at both levels in its call to incarnate the gospel.

The question all over my mind today is how do you move from an inward-focused, membership-driven church to one that both on individual and corporate levels engages with the surrounding culture?

The church needs to create space for free and open dialogue, and be willing to break herself for the good of the entire world. I question how insulation from the world (you know, the one that God thought was good) will serve to promote this dialogue, and serve the world with a witness of God's unimaginable grace.

Tags: Doctrine of Election, Ecclesiology, Emerging Church

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

you always ask such interesting, important questions.

i miss you. we should have cheesecake.

12:48 a.m.  
Blogger Val said...

Have you experienced an incredibly exclusive Church lately? :) Good conversation on Saturday. I hope your confusion and questions continue to disturb your soul. And I will pray for you and your ridiculous reality tv show idea. Happy Easter! Alleluia!

6:48 a.m.  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey, this is kat, tom's sister. i decided to read your blog when i saw the word "emerging" beside the name "andrew" on tom's blog links. i've had a bit of an interest in the idea of emerging churches, especially since i recently attended a conference where Brian McLaren, Chris Seay, and Donald Miller were the main speakers - three writers who are on the emerging church bandwagon, espcially McLaren.

Anyways, I like what you've discussed here regarding what the church should be, and your questions about inward vs. outward focuses. I was actually asking someone at Freedomize last week if she felt living rooms created too much of a bubble, and if it was hard to reach out beyond the church community. It's been on my mind a lot as a leader of Forums at my church, which are discussion groups. They became very much mini communities of Christians this past term, which isn't a bad thing, except the original intent of them was to be a safe place where unbelievers, seekers, critics, and believers alike could join in discussion about life, God, faith and Christian spirituality. The biggest question we're facing as leaders is, how do we get beyond our Christian bubbles and really meet the needs of our culture? Christian community is important, but it becomes unhealthy when we neglect the world beyond our Christian borders.

This stuff overwhealms me, but in a good way. I love thinking about it, so thanks for sharing your thoughts.

6:57 p.m.  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

thankyou so much for typing what you typed. it is perhaps some of the exact thoughts i've had recently.
i want community that is loving and lovely and gives and searches so that borders begin to disappear. . .

may He show us how to do this every day.

thankyou andrew!

10:42 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home